Friday, 24 January 2020

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY - MACP Supreme Court Order - Heard & Reserved - Order dated 23 Jan 2020

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY - MACP Supreme Court Order - Heard & Reserved - Order dated 23 Jan 2020


MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY - MACP Supreme Court Order - Heard Reserved - Order dated 23 Jan 2020


Arguments have been completed and the case is now reserved for orders. We expect a judgment allowing MACP on promotional hierarchy.
MACP on Promotional Hierarchy - Supreme Court Case Status - Order reserved

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY

Supreme Court Case No 21803/2014
Updates of today’s/ Final hearing-

Advocate C K Sasi (AOR), who was well briefed by us, argued the case for M V Mohanan Nair. Advocates, representing to other respondents also done commendable job. Actually it was a well organised team work. Amicus Curiae presented the case extremely well. He also submitted a written statement of his arguments to the court. As a result, the court realized the following:
  1. There are anomalies in MACP scheme as evident from Minutes of Meeting of Anomaly Committee.
  2. These anomalies are affecting Group B & C employees and no impact on Group A.
  3. These anomalies have life long impact.
Arguments have been completed and the case is now reserved for orders. We expect a judgment allowing MACP on promotional hierarchy.

Thanks
for Steering Committee
MACP on Promotional hierarchy

 
Case Status from Supreme Court Website:-

Diary No.- 14117 – 2014
UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY vs. M.V. MOHANAN NAIR
Case Details
Diary No.14117/2014 Filed on 24-04-2014 06:10 PM PENDING [SECTION: XI-A]
Case No.SLP(C) No. 021803 / 2014  Registered on 08-08-2014
S.L.P.(C)…CC No. 008271 / 2014  Registered on 21-05-2014
Present / Last Listed On23-01-2020 [HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA and HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY] [CL.NO. : 101]
Status/StagePending – (Final Hearing) Heard & Reserved-Ord dt:23-01-2020
Admitted[ADMITTED ON : 30-07-2019]
Category1900 -Three Judges Bench Matter
Act
Petitioner (s)1. UNION OF INDIA .DEPT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING SECRETARY

SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSION , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI , NEW DELHI , DELHI2 THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRAR

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG , DISTRICT: NEW DELHI ,NEW DELHI , DELHI3 KERALA
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR
ERNAKULAM BENCH , DISTRICT: KOCHIN, ERNAKULAM , KERALA
Respondent (s)1. M.V. MOHANAN NAIR S/D/W/Thru:- M.R VISHWANATHAN NAIR

PHOTO COPIER, CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL , DISTRICT: ERNAKULAM KOCHIN ,ERNAKULAM , KERALA
Pet. Advocate(s)ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA [P-2]
ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA [P-1]
ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA [P-3]
MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA
Resp. Advocate(s)C. K. SASI G. PRAKASH
Impleaders Advocate(s)MOHAN KUMAR [IMPL]
Intervenor Advocate(s)M. K. DUA[INT]
RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[INT]
SATISH KUMAR[INT]

Court Case, dopt latest order for macp, latest supreme court judgement on macp on promotional hierarchy, MACP, MACP on Promotional Hierarchy, supreme court decision on macp on promotional hierarchy, supreme court judgement on macp implementation, supreme court macp order

No comments:

Post a Comment

Flash News

9 hours of work is a normal working day for central government employees

9 hours of work is a normal working day for central government employees Central Government Employees Latest News Number of Hours o...